Smith v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
148 F.2d 288 · 1945
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1973
14 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Yakus v. United States · Hirabayashi v. United States · Falbovs v. United States · Billings v. Truesdell · Goff v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(2) to obey the instructions of the leader or assistant leaders appointed for the group being forwarded for induction, “(3) to appear at the place where his induction will be accomplished, “(4) to obey the orders of the representatives of the Armed Forces while at the place where his induction will be accomplished, “ (5) to submit to induction, and “(6) if he is found not qualified for induction to follow the instructions of the representatives of the Armed Forces as to the manner in which he will be transported on his return trip to the local board.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“includes a command to submit to induction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.