Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 F.2d 292 - Rossiter v. Vogel

Rossiter v. Vogel’s Empirical Analysis

148 F.2d 292 · 1945

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
4
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently June 1999 · most notably Securities and Exchange Commission v. Martin Frank, and Nylo-Thane Plastics Corp., Maurice Minuto, Olanda Minuto, Louis Braunston, Leonard Freedman (1968), Leon F. Urbain and Loxit Systems, Inc. v. Knapp Brothers Manufacturing Company, Al Levinson, Charles Levinson, and Robert Levinson (1954)

34 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

170194519501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fred Fisher Music Co. v. M. Witmark & Sons · Hurwitz v. Hurwitz · Rossiter v. Vogel · Sbicca-Del Mac, Inc. v. Milius Shoe Co. · Downey v. Palmer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]indings `are not a jurisdictional requirement of appeal,' but only `aid appellate courts in reviewing the decision below.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Under our earlier decision the assignment, if valid, would be treated as a present assignment of a future right. Hence the issue tendered was not the bare legal validity of the instrument, but whether defendants had established their defenses of lack of equity, justifying a court of equity in granting aid which was necessary to make the assignment ultimately effective.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.