Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 F.2d 380 - Greer v. Cline

Greer v. Cline’s Empirical Analysis

148 F.2d 380 · 1945

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
July 1978
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 1978

4 federal appellate ·

301945195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 7 U.S.C. § 511 · 7 U.S.C. § 511D · 7 U.S.C. § 511M

Relies on Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co. · United States v. Rock Royal Co-Op Noyes · Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority · Currin v. Wallace · American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnulty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But in our judgment, there are-valid reasons for denial of the injunctive relief sought and the dissolution of the temporary restraining order entered in the state court. There being-no statutory inhibition, the War Food' Administrator was vested, under the broad powers contained in Section 14 of the Act, with discretion to assign the additional set o-f inspectors to Glasgow. * * * (Emphasis added) “To issue injunctive process in the circumstances of the instant case would be to substitute the judgment of this court for that of the War Food Administrator in a matter in which that official is, by law, vested with discretion. To interfere in such case would be to interfere with the ordinary functions of government.” 148 F.2d at 384 (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.