Cleveland v. Higgins’s Empirical Analysis
148 F.2d 722 · 1945
Citation profile
40 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently August 2010 · most notably Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering & Machine, Inc. (1978), Anaconda-Ericsson Inc. v. Hessen (1985)
40 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co. · Tucker v. Alexander · Maass v. Higgins · United States v. Parker · Guettel v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) dismissal with prejudice is a final judgment on the merits”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.