Diamondstone v. Macaluso’s Empirical Analysis
148 F.3d 113 · 1998
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably United States v. Yousef (2003), United States v. Bayless (2000)
15 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mapp v. Ohio · Malley v. Briggs · Whren v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an objective, disinterested observer fully informed of the underlying facts, [would] entertain significant doubt that justice would be done absent recusal,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[d]isqualification is not required on the basis of remote, contingent, indirect or speculative interests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.