Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 F.3d 1196 - Smith v. Rogers Galvanizing Co.

Smith v. Rogers Galvanizing Co.’s Empirical Analysis

148 F.3d 1196 · 1998

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2022

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

701998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · Trustees v. Greenough · Blinzler v. Marriott International, Inc. · Smith v. Rogers Galvanizing Co. · 796 F. Supp. 403 - Phillips v. Riverside, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A district court has broad discretion to reopen a case to accept additional evidence and that decision will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.