Rosa v. Senkowski’s Empirical Analysis
148 F.3d 134 · 1998
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Ross v. Artuz · Mickens v. United States · 107 F.3d -1484 - Peterson v. Demskie · Joseph v. McGinnis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“April 24, 1997 expiration of the one-year grace period”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Flanagan v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.