Brink's, Incorporated v. Herman’s Empirical Analysis
148 F.3d 175 · 1998
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2013
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. · Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Reich · Castle Coal & Oil Co. v. Reich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we must also determine whether under the STAA [regulations, the Board] was bound by the ALJ’s findings of fact. If there was substantial evidence to support the ALJ’s findings, then the [Board’s] refusal to treat them as conclusive was contrary to [ 29 C.F.R. § 1978.109 (c)(3)] and [its] decision must be set aside.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“relate[ ] to a violation of a commercial motor vehicle safety regulation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.