Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 F.3d 242 - Christ's Bride Ministries, Inc. v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Christ's Bride Ministries, Inc. v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority’s Empirical Analysis

148 F.3d 242 · 1998

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority (1998), Tenafly Eruv Ass'n v. Borough of Tenafly (2002)

26 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

2501998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n · Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy · Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley · Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a constitutional duty to conduct an independent examination of the record as a whole,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Tenafly Eruv Association, Inc. v. The Borough Of Tenafly · 353 N.J. Super. 554 - RUTGERS 1000 ALUMNI v. Rutgers
  2. “-if anything, the government's reserved right to control speech without any particular standards or goals called for closer scrutiny. Id. at 251 . Moreover, the record revealed no policy or practice demonstrating that SEPTA intended the forum be closed to speech on the issue of abortion. Id. at 253 . Rather,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Sutliffe et al. v. Town of Epping · Ctr. for Investigative Civil Action Reporting v. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth.
  3. “Women Who Choose Abortion Suffer More & Deadlier Breast Cancer.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth. · Ctr. for Investigative Civil Action Reporting v. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.