Katona v. Kovacs’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
December 2014
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 11603
Relies on Miller v. Miller · Richard Charles Whallon Jr v. Diana Lynn · Holder v. Holder · 225 F. Supp. 2d 1337 - Bocquet v. Ouzid
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[wjhile the Hague Convention provides remedies for a violation of access rights, see id., art. 21, 19 I.L.M. at 1503, such remedies do not include an order of return to the place of habitual residence. Rather such remedies include, inter alia, ordering that the custodial parent who •removed the child from the child’s habitual residence reimburse the other parent for expenses incurred in exercising his or her rights of access. Id. art. 26, 19 I.L.M. at 1503-04.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cantor v. Cohen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.