Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 FRD 570 - Askanase v. Fatjo

Askanase v. Fatjo’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2018

1 state decisions

60199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Hishon v. King & Spalding · National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n · Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The allegations should allege the nature of the fraud, some details, a brief sketch of how the fraudulent scheme operated, when and where it occurred, and the participants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.