148 F. Supp. 2d 443 - Robertson v. Bartels’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district · 3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the facts supporting the motion for summary judgment by reference to each numbered paragraph of the movant party’s statement of material facts.” Local Civ. R. 56(c). Further, "unless a fact is admitted, the opposing statement shall support each denial ... by a record citation_” Id. Therefore, facts supported by citations to the record shall be deemed admitted unless properly controverted. . D.P.R. Civ. R. 56(b), often referred to as the anti-ferret rule, requires the party moving for summary judgment to submit a “separate, short, and concise statement of material facts, set forth in numbered paragraphs, as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue of material fact.” Similarly, the non-moving party is required to submit a counter-statement "admitting], denyting] or qualifying] the facts by reference to each numbered paragraph in the moving party’s statement of material facts and unless a fact is admitted, shall support each denial or qualification by record citation.” D.P.R. Civ. R. 56(c). . “The term privity is merely a word used to say that the relationship between one who is a party on the record and another is close enough to include the other within res judica-ta.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 4 F. Supp. 3d 342 - Rivera v. Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority