Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 FSUPP3D 477 - Does v. Cooper

Does v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Buckley v. Valeo · Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Kolender v. Lawson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]ubsections (a)(1) and (a)(2) provide sufficient notice to those subject to the law regarding where they are prohibited to go. The existence of a few marginal cases where the precise reach of the law is unclear does not make subsections (a)(1) and (a)(2) vague.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a)(1) applies where the place and premises in question are both primarily intended for the use, care, or supervision of minors”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[o]n the premises of any place intended primarily for the use, care, or supervision of minors....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.