Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 FSUPP3D 884 - Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes · In Re Tobacco II Cases · Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court · Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes · Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “whose rights are merged into the judgment, that is, who gets the benefit of any relief and who gets the burden of any loss, and avoids subsequent litigation over who was in the class in the first place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “it cannot be inferred that there is a 'high likelihood that in the process of buying the product, the consumer would have seen the misleading statement on the product and thus been exposed to it.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.