¶1This was an equity suit, and the plaintiff in order to obtain equity must do equity. The trial judge was authorized to find from the evidence that there was no tender by the plaintiff of the principal, interest, and costs due on the fi. fa.; and even if it be conceded that the judgment for the attorney’s fees was void, the- judge did not err in refusing an injunction against Chamlee and the sheriff, because the plaintiff did not offer to do equity by making the tender above referred to. -Judgment affirmed.
148 Ga. 488
Bigham v. Chamlee
Decided October 17, 1918
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1918-10-17
<p>Injunction. Before Judge Park. Hancock superior court. February 4, 1918.</p> <p>E. W. Bigham brought a petition against A. KL. Chamlee, A. E. Eobertson, and B. K. English, sheriff of Washington county, for injunction, and other equitable relief, making substantially the following allegations: On August 23, 1916, he exchanged certain lands with Eobertson for other described lands in Washington county which Eobertson claimed to own, but did not, and for*which Eobertson, on August 25, 1915, contracted with A. K. Chamlee, the owner, to purchase, paying Chamlee $1,000 of the purchase-money, giving his note due in sixty days' for $6,736, and taking bond from Chamlee to convey title to Eobertson upon payment of the note. The note was not paid, and Chamlee brought suit thereon. The note stipulated for 10 per cent, attorney’s fees, but no prayer for attorney’s fees was contained in the petition. By consent of Eobertson verdict and judgment were taken in favor of Chamlee for $6,736 principal, $651.13 interest, and 10 per cent, as attorney’s fees, amounting to $736.71. A fi. fa. was issued upon the judgment, and was levied upon the land in Washington county which plaintiff obtained by exchange with Eobertson. The fi. fa. is proceeding illegally because of the attorney’s fees included therein, and plaintiff seeks to enjoin the sale of the land thereunder. Eobertson holds the bond for title executed by Chamlee, and refuses to recognize that the possession of this bond by him inures to the benefit of the plaintiff; and plaintiff asks that it be brought into court and canceled upon his paying the principal, interest, and costs due on the fi. fa., in which event Chamlee should transfer to plaintiff the title to the land. Eobertson admits holding the bond for title from Chamlee, but refuses to transfer and deliver the same, because of other demands he makes upon the plaintiff. Chambee insists that his fi. fa. legally includes the item of attorney’s fees, etc.</p> <p>The ease was submitted on affidavits and argument of counsel, after which the court restrained the defendant Eobertson until further order, -but refused an injunction against Chamblee and the sheriff; and the plaintiff excepted.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1918-10-17
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 1956
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →