Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 Ill. 2d 281 - People v. Easley

148 Ill. 2d 281 - People v. Easley’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

126
cited by 126 later decisions
3
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 118 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 126 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably 189 Ill. 2d 99 - People v. Blue (2000), 192 Ill. 2d 307 - People v. Easley (2000)

4 federal appellate · 118 state decisions

5501992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Rhode Island v. Innis · Doyle v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 126 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The remarks by the prosecutor, while improper, do not amount to substantial prejudice”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “"Regardless, though, of whether the case had been submitted to the jury with or without the gang evidence, the jury would still have been presented with the testimony of the eyewitnesses to the murder as well as the physical evidence in support of the State's case against defendant. Accordingly, we hold that defendant was not denied his right to a fair and impartial trial by the introduction of the gang evidence." Easley, 148 Ill.2d at 330 , 170 Ill.Dec. 356 , 592 N.E.2d 1036 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “The effect of inflammatory evidence depends upon the circumstances of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.