Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 Kan. 472 - State v. Carter

State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
January 1989
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 1989

18 state decisions

80193819401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pfeifer · State v. Alexander · Bayouth v. State · State v. Smith · State v. McIntyre

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . [I]t is now well settled that the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, if otherwise sufficient, will sustain a verdict of guilty. The credit to be given to the evidence is a matter for the determination of the jury . . .” (l. c. 48.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.