Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 KAN 876 - Young v. Young

Young v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1953
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Myers v. Noble · Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Judd · Wright v. Simpson · Holmes v. Holt · Williams v. Campbell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court shall have full power to make any order not inconsistent with the provisions of this article that may be necessary to make a just and equitable partition between the parties, and to secure their respective interests.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.