148 Md. App. 364 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Chambers v. Mississippi · Roviaro v. United States · United States v. Green · United States v. Van Horn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The officer testified to what he saw, his sight fine, the angle of his view, lighting, timing, obstructions, his memory and potential bias. Questioning from both sides elicited answers concerning the ability of the officer to see the area, significantly diminishing any prejudice to appellant from nondisclosure of the exact surveillance location. Appellant does not proffer what else he would have been able to ask the officer had the exact location of his surveillance been disclosed. We perceive no error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Church v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.