Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 MICH 412 - Merrinane v. Miller

Merrinane v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1916
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Michigan Central Railroad · Peacock v. Oaks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whether this broad statement of the law may not require some qualification it is unnecessary to determine in this case. Plaintiff’s counsel conceded that plaintiff could only complain of illegal sales, but contended that among such sales were included sales after hours or on Sundays, etc. We think the instruction properly limited the effect of such sales.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.