148 Mich. App. 659 - In Re Stricklin’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether a penalty was exacted for appellants' refusal to testify [at child protective proceedings], sufficient to amount to the kind of compulsion contemplated by the Fifth Amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he choice not to testify was no more than appellants' tactical decision as to the best course to follow through the probate and criminal proceedings,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“compulsion was present in the case at bar because the specter of losing their parental rights was held over their heads if they chose not to testify.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.