148 N.C. App. 152 - Pardue v. Darnell’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 130 N.C. App. 729 - Bruce-Terminix Company v. Zurich Ins. Co. · Cutts v. Casey · 140 N.C. App. 737 - Von Viczay v. Thoms · Von Viczay v. Thoms · 120 N.C. App. 720 - Roberts v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was a voluntary dismissal with prejudice, barring them from refiling suit against defendant”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]t is well established that the standard of review of the grant of a motion for summary judgment requires a two-part analysis of whether, `(1) the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact; and (2) the moving party is entitled tojudgment as a matter of law.' (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.