Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 N.C. App. 290 - State v. Floyd

148 N.C. App. 290 - State v. Floyd’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

35 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · State v. Odom · State v. Coffey · Pataki v. Grumet · Kansas v. Nebraska

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “do not specify what constitutes a proper verdict sheet, [and] they contain no requirement that a written verdict contain each element of the offense to which it refers.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Reversal for plain error is only appropriate where the error is so fundamental that it undermines the fairness of the trial, or where it had a probable impact on the guilty verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “held that a verdict sheet is sufficient if the verdict can be properly understood by reference to the indictment, evidence and jury instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.