148 N.C. App. 290 - State v. Floyd’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
35 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · State v. Odom · State v. Coffey · Pataki v. Grumet · Kansas v. Nebraska
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“do not specify what constitutes a proper verdict sheet, [and] they contain no requirement that a written verdict contain each element of the offense to which it refers.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Reversal for plain error is only appropriate where the error is so fundamental that it undermines the fairness of the trial, or where it had a probable impact on the guilty verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“held that a verdict sheet is sufficient if the verdict can be properly understood by reference to the indictment, evidence and jury instructions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.