Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
2 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 1991
2 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Maher v. State · Jackson v. Olson · Jahnke v. State · State v. Hutter · Puckett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * any person who is present at the place of a crime, aiding and assisting in the commission thereof is in fact a principal and may be prosecuted as such. The same rule as to the information, conduct of the case, and punishment, applicable to the principal in fact now governs his aider and abettor or procurer, and no additional facts need be alleged in an information against the latter than are required against his principal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.