Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 N.J. 469 - State v. Marrero

State v. Marrero’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

149
cited by 149 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

147 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 149 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Cooper (1997), State v. Koskovich (2001)

147 state decisions

670199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on California v. ARC America Corp. · Great State Beverages, Inc. v. Wenners · West Virginia State Department of Tax & Revenue v. Internal Revenue Service · Youngberg v. United States · State v. Ramseur

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 149 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The evidence of the other crime must be admissible as relevant to a material issue; 2. It must be similar in kind and reasonably close in time to the offense charged; 3. The evidence of the other crime must be clear and convincing; and 4. The probative value of the evidence must not be outweighed by its apparent prejudice.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “trial court's ruling `was so wide of the mark that a manifest denial of justice resulted.'”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[d]eterminations on the admissibility of other-crime evidence are left to the discretion of the trial court”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.