State v. Rice

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LUMAS A. RICE, DEFENDANT, AND INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Argued February 15, 1977.

Decided February 25, 1977.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · decided 1977-02-25

Relies on 137 N.J. Super. 593 - State v. Rice

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-02-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2016

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before Judges LYNCH, MILMED and ANTELL.

¶2Mr. Vincent N. Macri argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Gold and Macri, attorneys; Mr. Jack Gold on the brief).

¶3Mr. Frank A. Tunnero argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Francis Patrick McQuade, Essex County Counsel, attorney; Mr. Richard M. Cignarella, First Assistant County Counsel, on the statement in lieu of brief).

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The order under review is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Scalera in his opinion of November 24, 1975, 137 N.J. Super. 593 (Cty. Ct. 1975).