Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 N.J. Super. 219 - State v. Smith

148 N.J. Super. 219 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
November 1996
most recently cited

2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1996

2 district · 6 state decisions

50197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Garrity v. State of New Jersey · Illinois Power Co. v. Local Union No. 51, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · Achilli v. United States · Yanow v. Seven Oaks Park, Inc. · State v. Auld

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “But the husband cannot be guilty of a rape committed by himself upon his lawful wife, for by their mutual matrimonial consent and contract the wife hath given up herself in this kind unto her husband, which she cannot retract. [1 Hale, History of the Pleas of the Crown ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Any person who has carnal knowledge of a woman forcibly against her will ... is guilty of a high misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000, or by imprisonment for not more than 30 years, or both .... [N.J. S.A. 2A:138-1 (repealed)]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “compelling force derived from our system of jurisprudence which must not be lightly disregarded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.