Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 N.J. Super. 27 - Cryan v. Klein

148 N.J. Super. 27 - Cryan v. Klein’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

2 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2005

2 district · 15 state decisions

1001977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harvey v. Essex County Board of Freeholders · Union Terminal Cold Storage Co. v. Spence · Leeds v. Harrison · City of Jersey City v. State Board of Tax Appeals · Haythorn v. Van Keuren & Son

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “implicitly empower the Commissioner to compel county governments to assume a share of the burden for maintenance of criminally sentenced defendants in the face of a statutory duty to accept the prisoners in a state institution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the `practical' solution of delaying their admittance in the state institution, thereby causing the county to incur expense normally the obligation of the State, is contrary to law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “absent legislative authority, there is no basis for the State to foist the care and maintenance of prisoners on the counties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.