Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 N.M. 50 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
5
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

63 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably 68 So. 3d 435 - State v. Sparks (2011), State v. Randy J. (2011)

63 state decisions

50020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Crawford v. Washington · Burdeau v. McDowell · Deck v. Missouri · State v. Gomez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Error that is fundamental must be such error as goes to the foundation or basis of a defendant's rights or must go to the foundation of the case or take from the defendant a right which was essential to his defense and which no court could or ought to permit him to waive. Fundamental error only applies in exceptional circumstances when guilt is so doubtful that it would shock the judicial conscience to allow the conviction to stand.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit the use of physical restraints visible to the jury absent a trial court determination, in the exercise of its discretion, that they are justified by a state interest specific to a particular trial[,]' including security concerns.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The trial court ... is in the best position to determine whether voir dire has sufficiently exposed any biases that may preclude jurors from acting fairly and impartially.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.