Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 N.W.2d 166 - Gress v. Gress

Gress v. Gress’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
March 1998
most recently cited

1 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 1998

1 district · 17 state decisions

1001967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 46 Cal. App. 2d 44 - Popescu v. Popescu · Parceluk v. Knudtson · Pauly v. Haas · Kucera v. Kucera · Bell v. Bell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ 'The general rule as to preference to be given to the mother in the award of custody of young children, or so-called “tender years doctrine,” is not, however, inflexible and applicable in every case merely because the mother has not been shown clearly unfit; and it has been said to be merely an aid to the court or one facet of the basic principle that the best interests and welfare of the child are the controlling considerations. The general rule is qualified by the requirement that other things be equal, and, whether or not such rule has been recognized or affirmed by statute, the mother of a child of tender years is not entitled to its custody as a matter of law. Accordingly, such a child may be awarded to the father, in the discretion of the court, where the circumstances of the case require it for the child’s best interests . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In an action for divorce, the court, before or after judgment, may give such direction for the custody, care, and education of the children of the marriage as may seem necessary or proper, and may vacate or modify the same at any time.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.