148 Ohio App. 3d 1 - Powell v. Grant Med. Ctr.’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 91 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 105 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably 228 Ill. 2d 181 - People v. Hudson (2008), 173 Ohio App. 3d 284 - Jarupan v. Hanna (2007)
2 federal appellate · 91 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America · State ex rel. Grady v. State Employment Relations Board · Paugh v. Hanks · 98 Ohio App. 3d 597 - Doner v. Snapp · Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`the existence of a contract, performance by the plaintiff, breach by the defendant, and damage or loss to the plaintiff.'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“[e]xpert medical testimony is not indispensable to a claim of serious emotional distress. * * * More particularly, as an alternative and in lieu of expert testimony, a plaintiff may submit the testimony of lay witnesses who are acquainted with the plaintiff as to any `marked changes in the emotional or habitual makeup' of the plaintiff following a defendant's allegedly culpable conduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“to a reasonable person. Paugh v. Hanks, 6 Ohio St.3d 72 (1983). Moreover, a court may decide whether a plaintiff has stated a cause of action in tort for purely emotional distress by ruling whether the emotional injury alleged is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.