Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 Ohio App. 3d 274 - State v. Smith

148 Ohio App. 3d 274 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably State v. Shannon (2020), State v. Brownlee (2018)

35 state decisions

180200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. V Companies v. Marshall · State v. Campbell · State v. Nicholas · United States v. Halbert · United States v. Mealy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a long-standing rule that information that a co-defendant has pleaded guilty to or has been convicted of an offense stemming from the same facts or circumstances forming the basis of a prosecution against another is inadmissible as proof against the other. See Kazer v. Ohio (1831), 5 Ohio 280 , 281-282 . This is because evidence that another pleaded guilty to or was convicted of an offense stemming from the same facts or circumstances is not necessarily evidence that the other committed the same offense. {¶ 90}”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.