Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 Ohio App. 3d 281 - State v. Baumgartner

148 Ohio App. 3d 281 - State v. Baumgartner’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · State v. Nero · State v. Xie · State v. Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) The court finds on the record that the shortest prison term will demean the seriousness of the offender's conduct or will not adequately protect the public from future crime by the offender or others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Winters, Unpublished Decision (12-1-2003)
  2. “Except as provided in division (C) * * * of this section.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Winters, Unpublished Decision (12-1-2003)
  3. “greatest likelihood of committing future crimes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Winters, Unpublished Decision (12-1-2003)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.