148 Ohio App. 3d 293 - State v. Urbin’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

29 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[a] conviction is not against the manifest weight of the evidence merely because there is conflicting evidence before the trier of fact.”

   18 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Brooks, Unpublished Decision (2-7-2007) · State v. Klema, Unpublished Decision (5-31-2006)

2. “review[s] the entire record, weighs the evidence and all reasonable inferences, considers the credibility of witnesses[,] and * * * resolve[s] conflicts in the evidence.”

   6 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Klema, Unpublished Decision (5-31-2006) · State v. Johnson, Unpublished Decision (3-30-2007)

3. “Thus, a determination that a conviction is supported by the weight of the evidence will also be dispositive of the issue of sufficiency.”

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Brooks, Unpublished Decision (2-7-2007) · State v. Kurjian, Unpublished Decision (12-18-2006)