148 Ohio App. 3d 606 - State v. McQueeney’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

55 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Failure on any of those points 'renders enforcement of the plea unconstitutional under both the United States Constitution and the Ohio Constitution.'”

   6 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Payne · State v. Harris

2. “Although strict compliance with Crim.R. 11 is preferred, a reviewing court will consider a plea to be knowing, intelligent, and voluntary so long as the trial judge substantially complies with Crim.R. 11. State v. Nero (1990), 56 Ohio St.3d 106 , 108 , 564 N.E.2d 474 . `Substantial compliance means that, under the totality of the circumstances, the defendant subjectively understands the implications of his plea and the rights he is waiving.' Id.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Rice, Unpublished Decision (12-7-2007) · State v. Broadway, L-07-1118 (1-25-2008)

3. “[W]hen a defendant enters a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity and then later enters a plea of guilty without formally withdrawing the not guilty by reason of insanity plea, the defendant has waived any argument pertaining to the insanity defense.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Pennington · State v. Baker