148 Ohio App. 3d 626 - In Re Mack’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “`Error in the admission of evidence is not ground for reversal unless substantial rights of the complaining party were affected or it appears that substantial justice was not done.' Petti v. Perna (1993), 86 Ohio App.3d 508 , 514 , 621 N.E.2d 580 . Further, `[i]n determining whether a substantial right of a party has been affected, the reviewing court must decide whether the trier of fact would have reached the same decision had the error not occurred.' Id., citing Hallworth v. Republic Steel Corp. (1950), 153 Ohio St. 349 , 41 O.O. 341 , 91 N.E.2d 690 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re Link, Unpublished Decision (1-27-2006)

2. “statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In the Matter of McLemore, Unpublished Decision (2-12-2004)

3. “should be given every procedural and substantive protection the law allows.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In the Matter of McLemore, Unpublished Decision (2-12-2004)