Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 Ohio App. 3d 82 - State v. Wiley

148 Ohio App. 3d 82 - State v. Wiley’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2020

21 state decisions

130200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 143 Ohio App. 3d 219 - State v. McConnell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the court grants a motion for judicial release under this section, the court shall order the release of the eligible offender, shall place the eligible offender under an appropriate community control sanction, under appropriate community control conditions, and under the supervision of the department of probation serving the court, and shall reserve the right to reimpose the sentence that it reduced pursuant to the judicial release if the offender violates the sanction. If the court reimposes the reduced sentence pursuant to this reserved right, it may do so either concurrently with, or consecutive to, any new sentence imposed upon the eligible offender as a result of the violation that is a new offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * prison time if the court decides to order consecutive sentence upon conviction for a new offense stemming from the violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.