148 Ohio App. 3d 92 - State v. Andrews’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2025
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Coley · 134 Ohio App. 3d 316 - State v. Shaw
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[B]ecause venue is a fact that must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt by the State, a pretrial motion challenging venue is not appropriate. A defendant may only challenge venue prior to trial if it equates to an actual defect in the indictment, for example, if the indictment fails to allege venue."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carpenter“Because venue is neither a jurisdictional nor a material element of a criminal offense, the indictment is only required to contain an allegation that the offense was committed within the jurisdiction of the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carpenter“the indictment contained a sufficient allegation that the offense was committed within the geographical jurisdiction of the court to defeat a motion to dismiss based upon improper venue”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carpenter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.