RILEY, J. ¶1 In this ease substantially the same state of facts is pleaded as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939. this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, and with which this case, together with others, was consolidated. ¶2 The judgment is accordingly affirmed. LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, GULLI-SON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J.,- not participating.
