Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 Or. App. 149 - State v. Ready

148 Or. App. 149 - State v. Ready’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2019

10 state decisions

40199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen the state relies on the consent of a third party to justify a search * * *, the third party must have actual authority to consent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[9] The state does not contend that Wells had actual authority to consent to the search of the CD by the police.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`necessarily involves resolution of factual issues.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.