State v. Parks’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2023
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gerstein v. Pugh · Steagald v. United States · State v. Walker · State v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder CrRLJ 2.5, it is not necessary that a probable cause finding be made at the time of issuing the bench warrant. But the bench warrant will not be valid unless the record establishes that the court made a finding of probable cause at some earlier point in the history of the case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Erickson · State v. Bishop“[c]ounsel for Parks stated that in her experience, some district courts made it a practice to find probable cause on the underlying charge, but Marysville Municipal Court did not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Erickson“fails to appear in response to a summons . . . if the sentence for the offense charged may include confinement in jail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Erickson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.