Candelaria v. People’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2021
1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Lowe · People v. Marcy · PEOPLE, BY RUSSEL v. District Court for Fourth JD · People v. Jefferson · People v. Frye
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“acts putting at risk a single victim, without knowing or caring who that may be,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[uJn-der circumstances evidencing an attitude of universal malice manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life generally.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[wle therefore construed the [language added in 1981] to proscribe killing acts of a particular description rather than attempting to carve out a new or intermediate culpable mental state”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Gross · People v. Lara
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.