Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 So. 3d 198 - Nolan v. State

148 So. 3d 198 - Nolan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Save Ourselves, Inc. v. La. Environ. Cont. Com'n · Doc's Clinic, APMC v. State · 845 So. 2d 518 - Stroscher v. Stroscher · 894 So. 2d 325 - DENHAM SPRINGS v. All Taxpayers · 879 So. 2d 815 - Maraist v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court may affirm the decision of the agency or remand the case for further proceedings. The court may reverse or modify the decision if substantial rights of the appellant have been prejudiced because the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions are: (1) In violation of constitutional or statutory provisions; (2) In excess of the statutory authority of the agency; (3) Made upon unlawful procedure; (4) Affected by other error of law; (5) Arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion; or (6) Not supported and sustainable by a preponderance of evidence as determined by the reviewing court. In the application of this rule, the court shall make its own determination and conclusions of fact by a preponderance of evidence based upon its own evaluation of the record reviewed in its entirety upon judicial review. In the application of the rule, where the agency has the opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses by first-hand observation of demeanor on the witness stand and the reviewing court does not, due regard shall be given to the agency's determination of credibility issues.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “any photograph, videotape, file, or other reproduction, whether electronic or otherwise, of any sexual performance involving a child under the age of seventeen.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Procedures for offenders convicted or adjudicated under ... federal law;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.