Cleveland v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Messer v. London · Russell v. Goldsby · 899 So. 2d 535 - Landiak v. Richmond · Dixon v. Hughes · 612 So. 2d 107 - Autin v. Terrebonne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person may change his domicile in order to qualify for a political office so long as that change is genuine and a change in fact, not a fiction to avoid the domicile requirement for qualification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harrington v. Bell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.