Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Nunn v. Baker · 659 So. 2d 998 - Hunt v. State · Law v. State · 731 So. 2d 626 - Nettles v. State. · Pender v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘we note that, although the record indicates that [Mewborn] was convicted ... as the result of a “plea bargain” ..., the record is unclear as to whether [Mew-born’s] sentence was part of the plea bargain. Thus, “it is impossible for this Court to determine whether resentenc-ing [Mewborn] will affect the voluntariness of his plea.” Austin [v. State ], 864 So.2d [1115] at 1119 [(Ala.Crim.App.2003) ].’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mewborn v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.