148 S.W. 1090
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided June 26, 1912
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1912-06-26
<p>Criminal Law (§ 1121 *) — Appeal—Review.</p> <p>The facts not having been sent up, the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict cannot be reviewed.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2938, 2939; Dec. Dig. § 1121.*]</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1949
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1912-06-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Appellant was convicted of burglary; his punishment being assessed at three years’ confinement in the penitentiary.
¶2The only ground of the motion for new trial complains of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict of the jury and judgment of the court. There is no merit under this record in that contention, the facts not having been sent up, and the judgment will be affirmed.