Jamison v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1941
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 135 Tex. Crim. 406 - Norwood v. State · 110 Tex. Crim. 420 - Crutchfield v. State · 130 Tex. Crim. 585 - Hill v. State · 96 Tex. Crim. 493 - Moore v. State · 61 Tex. Crim. 551 - Best v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is a limitation on the use of certain testimony, and allows the jury to utilize such testimony as to all relevant facts and circumstances surrounding the killing and the previous relationship between the parties, only for the purpose of assessing the punishment of the accused. This we think is an undue limitation on such testimony. We think such circumstances and relationship between the parties could also be utilized by the jury when passing upon the whole case; often times such might and does affect the guilt or innocence of the party upon trial, and would be pertinent proof relative thereto.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ ‘It was not incumbent upon the judge to give a special instruction on good character. The law permits one accused of crime to put his previous good character before the jury for their consideration. All the court is required to do is to permit the evidence to go to the jury, to be by them considered in connection with the other testimony in the case, in order to determine from the whole evidence the guilt or innocence of the accused.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State“Article 1257a, [Vernon's Ann.P.C.] seems to lay down only a rule as to what evidence may be introduced on the trial of a homicide case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.