Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 S.W.3d 666 - Tinker v. State

Tinker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 21st Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Clewis v. State · Matson v. State · McDuff v. State · Zuniga v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the [defendant]... intentionally or knowingly... causes the penetration of the ... sexual organ of another person by any means, without that person's consent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “complainant's testimony alone is sufficient to support”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.