Harrison v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “In an Opinion delivered on October 27, 2004, the Ninth District Court of Appeals concluded that the trial court’s finding that out-patient supervision was not appropriate [was] not supported by the record, and thus reversed this court’s judgment and remanded for further proceedings consistent with their Opinion. Pursuant to Article 46.03, section 4(d)(4) [as referenced by the appellate court in [its opinion]], it is within the trial court’s discretion to determine the appropriate regimen of medical, psy chiatric, or psychological care or treatment, which could include psychoactive medications. This court has appointed Dan Roberts, Ph.D ... to conduct an evaluation of Millet Harrison for this purpose.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Harrison v. State

2. “[T]he trial court’s [December 2003] finding that out-patient supervision is not appropriate is not supported by the record. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Harrison v. State