Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

148 S.W.3d 855

Fleming v. Rowley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 2004

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2004-10-26

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2005

2 state decisions

Relies on Fischer v. City of Washington · Webster v. Purkett · McDermott v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-10-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

GEORGE W. DRAPER III, C.J.

¶1 William Fleming (Appellant) appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus.

¶2 We are obligated in every case to determine whether we have jurisdiction and if we lack jurisdiction to entertain an appeal, then it should be dismissed. Fischer v. City of Washington, 55 S.W.3d 372, 377 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). Here, Appellant seeks to appeal from the judgment dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court. An appeal does not lie from the denial or dismissal of a petition for habeas corpus. McDermott v. State, 120 S.W.3d 261, 262 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). A petitioner’s remedy where a petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed is to file a new petition in a higher court. Webster v. Purkett, 110 S.W.3d 832, 837 (Mo.App. E.D.2003).

¶3 We issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. Appellant filed a response, but offers no argument regarding the lack of jurisdiction. Instead, he argues the merits of his case. Without jurisdiction, this Court cannot address the merits.

¶4 The appeal is dismissed for lack of an appealable judgment.

LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J., concur.
/148/sw3d/855 · .json · Public domain